digital emunction | the personal website of robert p. baird

Mandeans Strike Back

Hot on the heels of For­rest Gander’s appre­ci­a­tion of Eliot Weinberger’s An Ele­men­tal Thing comes this letter* in the new Harper’s:

Eliot Weinberger’s essay “Man­daeans,” which appeared in the May 2007 issue of Harper’s Mag­a­zine, con­tains the fol­low­ing incor­rect state­ments that vilify Mandaeans:

They dis­like the Jews, whom they call “an evil nation” founded by the rene­gade Man­daeans Abra­ham and Moses, a people “who do not agree on a single utter­ance,” who cir­cum­cise with swords and sprin­kle the blood on them­selves, whose hus­bands aban­don their wives and lie down with each other.

They say the Chris­tians have secret rites in which they wor­ship a female donkey with three legs.

They dis­like the Zoroas­tri­ans, who sleep with their moth­ers and sis­ters and eat the dead, who take vows of silence and abort their babies.

These alle­ga­tions are with­out foun­da­tion. Man­daeans hold no such views. Man­daeans do not enter­tain any hos­til­ity toward Jews, Chris­tians, or Zoroas­tri­ans. Man­daeans have noth­ing but good­will toward Jews, Chris­tians, and Zoroastrians.

Nor is it cor­rect to say, as Wein­berger does, that “each year they have a cer­e­mony to honor the Egyp­tians who drowned when the Red Sea closed over them as they pur­sued Moses and the Jews.” This state­ment implies that Man­daeans strongly sym­pa­thize with a tyrant who was pur­su­ing people who were escap­ing from slav­ery. Man­daeans do not hold such views. In fact, the annual com­mem­o­ra­tion of Nuh relates to those who drowned in Noah’s flood.

Some fol­low­ers of John the Bap­tist
via the Internet

+++

*Sub­scrip­tion required.

Forrest Gander on Eliot Weinberger & Pico Iyer on Peter Matthiessen

   

For­rest Gander has a nice (re)consideration of Eliot Weinberger’s An Ele­men­tal Thing, “the best book by our best living lit­er­ary essayist,” over at Har­riet. (My con­tri­bu­tion to the “scant attention” the book received after its pub­li­ca­tion may be read here.)

And while I’m at it, may I rec­om­mend Pico Iyer’s essay on Peter Matthiessen’s The Snow Leop­ard in the cur­rent NYRB? It’s a sen­si­tive and thought­ful piece, and useful not least as anti­dote to the clat­ter and in(s)anity of the cur­rent season. (I’ll post a link when the NYRB site starts work­ing again.)

Now Available: Chicago Review British Poetry Issue

Chicago Review 53:1 | British Poetry Issue



A 232-page issue fea­tur­ing the poetry of Andrea Brady, Chris Goode, Peter Manson, and Keston Suther­land. Also: crit­i­cal work on these poets by Jeremy Noel-​Tod, Simon Jarvis, John Wilkin­son, and Matt Ffytche; and an inter­view with Chris Goode by Sam Ladkin. The issue also includes fif­teen reviews of new British poetry (includ­ing my review of Peter Larkin’s Leaves of Field [PDF]), a note by Keith Tuma on younger British poets, let­ters by Cather­ine Wagner and Peter Riley, and a poster by Andrew Duncan (”Styles of British Poetry 1945-2000″).

Order online!

[Read more]

Chicago Review | Lisa Robertson

Chicago Review 51:4 & 52:1

This 272-page double issue includes:

LISA ROBERT­SON SPE­CIAL FEATURE

With two long poems, two essays, an inter­view by Kai Fierle-​Hedrick, a check­list, and crit­i­cal essays by Ben­jamin Fried­lan­der, Chris­tine Stew­art, Jen­nifer Scap­pet­tone, and Joshua Clover.

POEMS

Stephen Collis, Ros­marie Wal­drop, Rusty Mor­ri­son, Genya Tur­ovskaya, Karen Weiser, Jacque­line Waters, Cesar Vallejo, Friedrich Hölderlin, Gnoetry & Eric P. Elsh­tain, Peter Gizzi, Michael Kindel­lan, and John Matthias

FIC­TION

Pamela Lu

ESSAYS

Stephen Rode­fer, Calvin Bedi­ent, and Eliot Weinberger

REVIEWS
Tim­o­thy Yu on the Future of Asian Amer­i­can Poetry, Norman Finkel­stein on Donald Revell, Dustin Simp­son on For­rest Gander, Leila Wilson on Eleni Sike­lianos, Ihor Junyk on Hannah Krall, Martin Riker on Patrick Oured­nik, Paul Mer­chant on Alan Halsey, and V. Joshua Adams on Bin Ramke.

A NOTE on Gnoetry and the period style.

Order it here.

,

04