Sorry, But No: Defending the Homeland Edition
Megan McArdle, responding to the Obama campaign’s new attack on McCain’s Charles Keating links, writes:
[I]n fact I think that the Ayers connection is too tenuous to be interesting. But there is a nugget of a real critique at its heart, which is that the academic culture Obama belongs to thinks its just fine to be a former active terrorist who has refused to renounce support for the violence committed by his group; that culture has rewarded Bill Ayers with prestigious employment and other positions in a way that it wouldn’t dream of rewarding a similarly “idealistic” abortion clinic bomber. I know it’s hard to imagine, but if you’re conservative, that seems like a real problem.
So McArdle thinks the academy is to blame for not only accepting but even cosseting Ayers, and Obama is implicated because he’s a member of that same morally bankrupt institution, the university.
But if you look at what actually happened when it came to Ayers’s social (which is not, obviously, to say moral) rehabilitation, the key factor is pretty clearly his father, who was the former chairman of Commonweath Edison, one of the Midwest’s major energy companies. Here’s a bit from a Nov. 11, 1985 LA Times article about Bernardine Dohrn’s (Ayers’s wife) attempt to join the New York bar:
Dohrn was graduated from the University of Chicago Law School in 1967. Lawyers familiar with large firms say it is very unusual for someone with an 18-year gap in her legal career to be hired by a firm like Sidley & Austin. One possible explanation, they say, is that Dohrn is married to William Ayers, a former Weather Underground activist, and Ayers’ father is Thomas Ayers, former chairman of Commonwealth Edison and a leading member of Chicago’s Establishment.The elder Ayers recently headed Chicago’s effort to obtain the 1992 World’s Fair. Sidley & Austin served as lawyers for the World’s Fair Authority. He also serves on the board of the Chicago Tribune Co.
And here’s how Michael Kinsley put it back in May:
When it became clear even to them that there would not be violent revolution in America, Ayers and Dohrn shrugged and rejoined society in Chicago, where he had grown up. It wasn’t difficult. While he was in hiding, his father was CEO of Commonwealth Edison, the big utility. Ayers the elder sat on every Establishment board in town–Northwestern, the Tribune Co., the Chicago Symphony. Ayers the younger and his wife were welcomed back into the fold.
This is the second insult that emerges from the story of Bill and Bernardine. They set off bombs and talked about killing their parents, and the Chicago establishment didn’t even care. The important thing is that he was Tom Ayers’ boy.
If one were only interested in scoring points against one’s favorite bêtes noires, he might ask where we’re to find the conservative critique of firms like ComEd and Sidley for their complicity in rehabilitating Ayers and Dorhn. Or better yet, to ask why the corporate-legal culture as a whole is so willing to ignore the past misdeeds of unrepentant former terrorists.
But that’s a pretty boring game. Lots of bad people–and like Kinsley, I count Ayers as a bad person–make it into lots of kinds of professions, and lots of people get rehabilitated for all kinds of reasons, most of them having nothing to do with justice. (Cf. Henry Blodget, who has written on financial matters for McArdle’s employer despite his involvement in securities fraud.) If McArdle wants to hate the university and the culture that surrounds it, that’s up to her. But one would hope she would do it without resorting to this kind of witless neo-McCarthyism. Does she really think that someone like Cass Sunstein is a Weather Underground fellow traveler? I expect not; but if that’s the case, then what’s the point in suggesting it?

No Comments, Comment or Ping
Reply to “Sorry, But No: Defending the Homeland Edition”