The McCain story may well turn out to be the not-so-sharp instrument with which the New York Times delivers the coup de grâce to Hillary Clinton’s candidacy.
Here’s the thought: Ten straight victories mean that Barack Obama’s had nothing but good press since the February 9 contests. What’s more, Obama’s been gaining in national polls and in Ohio and Texas. The only plausible way that Hillary could stem that tide is to get some seriously bad news about Obama on the television and the front pages of the newspapers and the interwebs. That would be a tall order in any case—witness the flame-out of the plagiarism and Michelle-is-finally-proud-of-the-country stories. But now the McCain did-he-or-didn’t-he spectacular (combined with the should-the-Times-or-shouldn’t-they minitacular) is guaranteed to occupy the journalism corps for at least a week. Which means that HRC really only has March 3, the day before the big primaries, to get whatever nasty thing she has to say about Barack up and into the news cycles. And by then it’ll be too late.

