Robert P. Baird
Thus begins the entry in Henry Thoreau’s Journal for July 5, 1845. Since March of that year, Thoreau had been building a cabin near Walden Pond on land that Ralph Waldo Emerson had bought the previous year. (RWE paid $8.10/acre for eleven acres of pasture and $125.00 for three or four acres of adjacent woods.) Thoreau had borrowed an axe and cut down a few of the white pines from Emerson’s woodlot to frame his ten-by-fifteen-foot cabin. In May, some friends had come out from Concord and helped him raise the structure. He used the boards from a shack he’d purchased for roof and siding. “It is difficult to begin without borrowing,” Thoreau tells us, with absolute accuracy, in Walden.
We know the rest of the story: for two years and two months, Thoreau lived in his Walden cabin to get back to the root of things:
I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived.
What few people realize, however, is the extent to which Thoreau’s journey out to Walden Pond was tied up with his own fortunes and failures as a professional writer.
…Read More…
Robert P. Baird
For years I’ve been telling anyone who will listen that public radio’s This American Life was ready for a takedown. Some aspiring social critic would come along and dig a dirty nail into the rind of every hipster’s favorite radio show, peel it to show how mawkish, vain, and gawdawfully sententious the whole production can be, and even possibly convince someone at NPR or APM or wherever they make these things that yes, in fact, you might be able to do better than Ira Glass. After Curtis White went after Fresh Air and n+1 attacked McSweeney’s, TAL seemed the only low-hanging fruit left for the knocking.
Well, here it is, courtesy of Michael Hirschorn at The Atlantic.
And though I wish it were otherwise, I can’t say I’m impressed. Forget the coarse and unhelpful category of “quirk” (Jonathan Safran Foer sharing oxygen with Wes Anderson?) and the formulations (”TAL…is really the opposite of documentary reportage. It’s more like sociology,” ”that hoary emotion called sentiment”) that sound as silly as TAL’s own self-congratulations (”what we’re doing is applying the tools of journalism to everyday lives”). The major problem is that Hirschorn only scratches where he ought to maim. As Emerson told Oliver Wendell Holmes: if you strike at a king you must kill him.