On Zelaya

Conscience compels me to add that in focusing so directly on the coup I don’t mean to imply that Mel Zelaya, the ousted president, is some kind of exiled saint. As Kevin Casas-Zamora of the Brookings Institution notes, he had his own difficulties respecting the spirit and the letter of the Honduran constitution:
As other Latin American leaders, President Zelaya fell victim to the virus of presidential reelection….The real problem, however, was that by organizing a de facto referendum to test the popularity of his idea, Zelaya pursued his ambition with total disregard of his country’s constitution. The latter explicitly forbids holding referenda—let alone an unsanctioned “popular consultation”—to amend the constitution and, more specifically, to modify the presidential term. Unsurprisingly, the president’s idea met with the resistance of Congress, nearly all parties (including his own), the press, business, electoral authorities, and, crucially, the Supreme Court, that deemed the whole endeavor illegal.
But the idea that one illegal act doesn’t excuse another is one of the pillars of the rule of law. Though the unprosecuted skeletons in our own closet suggest that the US doesn’t have the same moral standing on this question as before, it’s nice to see Obama dealing with the Honduras situation in unambiguous terms.
(AP Photo)

