Enrique Ortez Col­in­drez, the for­eign min­is­ter of Honduras’s ille­gal gov­ern­ment, speak­ing to a Hon­duran TV sta­tion on June 29:

“He nego­ci­ado con mari­cones, pros­ti­tu­tas, con ñángaras (izquierdis­tas), negros, blan­cos. Ese es mi tra­bajo, yo estudié eso. No tengo pre­juicios raciales, me gusta el negrito del batey que está pre­si­di­endo los Esta­dos Unidos.”

——–

“I have nego­ti­ated with queers, pros­ti­tutes, left­ists, blacks, whites. This is my job, I stud­ied for it. I am not racially prej­u­diced. I like the little black sugar plan­ta­tion worker who is pres­i­dent of the United States.”

Con­science com­pels me to add that in focus­ing so directly on the coup I don’t mean to imply that Mel Zelaya, the ousted pres­i­dent, is some kind of exiled saint. As Kevin Casas-​Zamora of the Brook­ings Insti­tu­tion notes, he had his own dif­fi­cul­ties respect­ing the spirit and the letter of the Hon­duran constitution:

As other Latin Amer­i­can lead­ers, Pres­i­dent Zelaya fell victim to the virus of pres­i­den­tial reelection….The real prob­lem, how­ever, was that by orga­niz­ing a de facto ref­er­en­dum to test the pop­u­lar­ity of his idea, Zelaya pur­sued his ambi­tion with total dis­re­gard of his country’s con­sti­tu­tion. The latter explic­itly for­bids hold­ing referenda—let alone an unsanc­tioned “pop­u­lar consultation”—to amend the con­sti­tu­tion and, more specif­i­cally, to modify the pres­i­den­tial term. Unsur­pris­ingly, the president’s idea met with the resis­tance of Con­gress, nearly all par­ties (includ­ing his own), the press, busi­ness, elec­toral author­i­ties, and, cru­cially, the Supreme Court, that deemed the whole endeavor illegal.

But the idea that one ille­gal act doesn’t excuse another is one of the pil­lars of the rule of law. Though the unpros­e­cuted skele­tons in our own closet sug­gest that the US doesn’t have the same moral stand­ing on this ques­tion as before, it’s nice to see Obama deal­ing with the Hon­duras sit­u­a­tion in unam­bigu­ous terms.

(AP Photo)

Yes­ter­day the Hon­duran Con­gress, work­ing almost cer­tainly at the behest of Roberto Micheletti (who was Speaker of the Con­gress until the coup), sus­pended the fol­low­ing con­sti­tu­tional rights for its cit­i­zens between the hours of 9pm and 5am: habeas corpus, free­dom of assem­bly, free pas­sage, free­dom from police coer­cion and vio­lence, and free­dom from com­pul­sory self-​incrimination (the right to remain silent).

From Ray Walser at, nat­u­rally, The Corner:

Con­gress, the courts, and the mil­i­tary joined forces to send [Hon­duran Pres­i­dent] “Mad” Mel [Zelaya] pack­ing. In a delib­er­ate, bipar­ti­san manner, they selected a new pres­i­dent to serve until reg­u­lar elec­tions in November.

And for the reality-​based among us, here are the first 3 parts of the OAS res­o­lu­tion con­demn­ing the coup—

1. To con­demn vehe­mently the coup d’état staged this morn­ing against the constitutionally-​established Gov­ern­ment of Hon­duras, and the arbi­trary deten­tion and expul­sion from the coun­try of the con­sti­tu­tional pres­i­dent José Manuel Zelaya Ros­ales, which has pro­duced an uncon­sti­tu­tional alter­ation of the demo­c­ra­tic order.

…Read More…