digital emunction | a multiauthor blog founded and edited by robert p. baird

I’m a Runaway Son of the Nuclear A-Bomb

Bobby has made Mailer’s tag his own, but this is an adver­tise­ment fa mice elf agin. I’ll be read­ing my poems at Myopic Books this Sat­ur­day, Feb­ru­ary 20,  at 7 pm. Details here. Daniel Borzutzky is also read­ing, so please stop by if you’re in the neighborhood.

How awe­some is it that Sawyer was blast­ing “Search & Destroy” last night.

13 Responses

  1. Jordan says:

    I’m read­ing with Dana Ward at the Bowery Poetry Club on Sat­ur­day, Feb­ru­ary 27 at 4 p.m.

  2. Would that I could be there!

  3. Jordan says:

    Like­wise. Alas, no Chicago for me until… I don’t know what.

  4. Henry Gould says:

    Sorry for the diver­sion, but as of now, real time 8;50 pm east­ern stan­dard time, the Has­r­riet blog is furi­ously delet­ing com­ments to the most recent post, by Annie Finch, on the PSA exhibit on poets’ child­hood photos.

    I made so bold as to ques­tion (on “negative capability” grounds) the cul­tural value of such an exhibit. It struck me as insti­tu­tional nar­cis­sism & self-​adulation, unbe­fit­ting of poetry. Rich Villar coun­tered with a remark that it was impor­tant to people of color. I admit­ted that I was set­ting aside the whole issue of “equal representation” – because I didn’t think it was worth being rep­re­sented in, by any­body.

    That’s a very rough approx­i­ma­tion of the 7-8 com­ments which sud­denly dis­ap­peared. “No comment.”

    Maybe they’ll come back?

    Imag­ine this hap­pen­ing on a post about “equal representation”. Sort of like 1984. War is Kind. (No, that was Stephen Crane, I think.)

  5. Henry Gould says:

    It’s not impor­tant, in the grand scheme of things. Nobody reads much anyway. Everybody’s dodg­ing the col­laps­ing roofs, I guess. Telling it slant, really slant.

    • Henry Gould says:

      Seems to have been a com­puter glitch. I have no way of know­ing. They lost some good com­ments. Sorry for this inter­rup­tion – back to reg­u­lar com­men­ta­tion aug­men­ta­tion.

  6. Fair warn­ing: I’m tired of com­ments about the ins and outs of Harriet’s com­ment mod­er­a­tion. From this point on, I will delete with­out notice any future com­ments about same. I believe that there are whole web­sites ded­i­cated to crit­i­ciz­ing Har­riet; I’m sure they’d wel­come your com­plaints there.

  7. Henry Gould says:

    What is it with com­ment threads? Relax. You web pub­lish­ers want to be heard, but you don’t like back­talk. You’re pro­vid­ing a forum, for which I, for one, am very grate­ful – yet you get all snippy about the ensu­ing con­ver­sa­tion. Go ahead & “moderate” this, Bobby, if it makes you feel better.

  8. Michael Robbins says:

    I posted a brief note about my read­ing. What has that to do with Harriet’s com­ment policy? Why must every thread become a “conversation” between the same two people about some­thing com­pletely dif­fer­ent from the topic at hand? How is it so hard to under­stand why people would get sick of that?

  9. Henry Gould says:

    Hey, have a nice day. Try some o.j. Squir­rels are swing­ing through the trees.

  10. Henry Gould says:

    You should appre­ci­ate inter­ested & active read­ers & respon­ders to this blog. You should be patient with the occa­sional – & I mean it IS occa­sional – side light such as above. But hey, don’t let anyone stand in the way of your self-​advertisements.

  11. Henry Gould says:

    btw, Michael, I do wish you a good read­ing tomor­row. Sorry I’m stuck here in ol’ Podunk. Break a squirrel’s leg. As I noted above, my apolo­gies for intrud­ing on your announce­ment. Nei­ther mod­er­ate nor mod­er­a­tor be, as Zarathus­tra once said. & I now I retract myself unto my coc­coon of mystic silence. Let every thread run straight! Let small rain down shall rain! Let hogs whis­tle and ham­sters make haste! & etc. etc. etc. !!

  12. Michael Robbins says:

    how can this be the most-​read post on de? it doesn’t say any­thing. it even has a sell-​by date.



Leave a Reply

IMG_4473