Ammons’ Tape
Tired of tired holiday traditions? I’ve initiated a new one this year with a dear friend who lives across the country: we’re reading A. R. Ammons’ long poem Tape for the Turn of the Year one day at a time between December 6 and January 10 (Ammons composed the poem thus, in the form of a diary-epic, in 1963). I suggested the idea to my friend after reading Oren Izenberg’s essay, “We Are Reading: Collective Intentions Across Poems,” published last year in Modern Philology. So far, it appears to have wings.
Although I’m a devoted Ammons fan, I’ve always had trouble with this poem. It has moments of characteristic grandeur, but also long tracts of strained and stunted ground. I realize now that the way to read Tape, or at least one good way, is in the spirit that it was written: as a rough-and-tumble experiment in the generative possibilities of arbitrary formal structure. Tape was composed on a roll of adding tape run through a typewriter, the roll thus dictating line length as well as the length of the poem itself. Ammons tells the tale for the first time in the opening section:
it was natural for / me (in the House & / Garden store one / night a couple weeks / ago) to contemplate / this roll of adding-machine tape, so / narrow, long, / unbroken, and to penetrate / into some fool use for it
Ammons compares the struggle of writing this long, thin poem day after day to Sisyphus’ fate—battling boredom, seeking a sign from the muse, watching shadows crawl along the wall, counting birds on the lawn when the words won’t come, thinking about lunch or sex instead of versifying—and his struggle is supposed to be a felt part of reading it. Hence, one of the dominant subjects in the poem is the seemingly endless length of the roll, often with puns on sexual competence and impotence. Here’s one among many such moments, from December 11:
Let’s have faith to go / ahead & see if anything / will happen: / maybe the tape will run out . . . if I had a flute: wdn’t / it be fine / to see this long thin / poem / rise out of the waste- / basket: / the charmed erection: / stiffening, uncoiling?
Ammons is careful to preserve fidelity to the original artifact: he keeps misspellings and has apparently revised nothing, choosing instead to critique himself or celebrate his better moments as the tape rolls on, usually a day or two after the fact. Feeling paranoid one night when he goes to visit family, he even temporarily “backguts” the tape out of the typewriter and takes it along for the ride (“what if the house caught / fire while I was gone?”).
Tape goes nowhere fast, and stays there. Like the best holiday afternoons, it is mostly gentle and uneventful, peppered by mild pleasures. This is why it is best read from one day to the next, leisurely and in different states (I recommend whiskey and hard coffee at different times of day, but on the same sections—again, great for the holidays). Virtually every day, usually at the beginning of the section, Ammons offers a report on the weather and on the creatures and vegetable life in his yard. Three examples:
sunshine & shade / alternate at 32: winter / seems about to, but hasn’t / quite decided how to / happen . . . when the first / horizontal haze of / sunlight struck the sumac / thicket this morning, / bluejay flew in / and sat on an outside / limb, his / appreciation, meditative / but imperfect, troubled / by starlings (December 11)
first I heard/ on the radio this morning / it was / 19 degrees / but it’s bright sunny / and / believe it or not / there’re a couple of / flies / out on the porch, still / okay, doing fine on “areas of warmth”: / but doing I don’t / know what at night: / a one-legged starling / was hopping around on the / porch when I just drove / up: and a catbird was / sitting in the green-withered / rhododendron bush, / warming (December 16)
10:29 a.m: the bead’s gone / 11:40 a.m: fine, hurrying snow: / 12:48 pm: everything white: / 3:20 pm: still snowing (December 18)
I don’t know, perhaps the accumulation of minutiae from day to day will annoy some readers. I’ve found it deeply pleasurable these last few weeks, especially between sessions of reading while I move about in my own day and local weather, noting differently the variety there. Ammons embraces the mundane with an almost religious intensity, and he accepts his foolishness and the foolishness of writing his fool poem with grace. Sometimes he mocks his own self-seriousness:
the poet lolls, suckled / up in the rapture of his / sacred saying: // a nerveless creature / because all nerves: odd-one-out / because he stands aside to / see: fool that makes / foolishness a law: / will you be ruled, / sir, metered out? / the poet implores you to / get the hell off his back: / he will have / room / and a universe / to cry all day / the trampling of a weed
At other times, we see that Ammons’ wonder in the face of birds and weeds is of a piece with his wonder in the face of more typical subjects of sublimity. Between the weather and a description of lunch—soup, sandwich, milk, cookie, coffee—on December 14, Ammons complains about the length of his tape, then launches into a sort of biblical lament on damned “exclusions”:
lepers on their islands, / drunks imprisoned in / drunkenness, / the disappearances (un- / noticed—the streets / seem always full, / lively & young enough) / into illness, stiff bones, strokes, graves: / the silent child that stays / indoors, / unable to connect: / I feel the bitterness of / fate: I feel the / bitterness of fate: // what it means to / drive away from the / house: take a walk / down the street: / join the daylight / world’s clean going
This is one of many lyric eruptions from within Ammons’ humdrum catalog, but he is also in the poem a “recorder” of mere events, and sometimes ordinariness is interrupted by the extraordinary from without. December 8 ends with a description of rare winter thunder and lightning, following by a “submissive, unwilling drizzle.” Ammons leaves his diary for the night with an apparently inconsequential set of images, recorded first in relation to his poem:
sequence: events / stalled in their / occurrence: a / running with, fleet / recorder at the crest of change: / a plane is in / this: / it rumbles in the / distance, a chord through / my circular knowledge: it / is out in the rain
December 9 opens with weather again, but soon reveals a deeper significance there. The same storm that had moved in Ammons poem and mind, lending a mild wonder to this early section, has wrought “real” violence elsewhere:
sunny again: // last night a plane / over Delaware struck the / storm / & 80 lives descended in / flames
A bizarre sense of guilt enters this section, as though Ammons’ use of the storm in the poem and the death of the plane’s passengers were somehow connected, just as the loss of these lives is connected, intimately, to lesser losses:
reality last night was / more than I apprehended: / is far more today / than feebleness lets me / know: / wind ruined several dead / weeds and rain / de-seeded a lot of grass
It is in this way that Tape is most obviously connected with Ammons’ larger poetic project. He is a poet of the very large and the very small, of the universal in the particular and of unity in difference, as he reminds us explicitly more than once in this poem. But what is the use of grand philosophic speculation, vatic vision, or even of cheap humor, when it all takes place on adding-machine tape? Who is Ammons talking to? I think I’ll have more to say about that after I’ve finished the poem (look for another post on or around January 10). For now, I leave you instead with his own answer, or one of them:
we must all / die, it’s quite / remarkable— / nevertheless, true: / but breakfast, and getting / off to school & work, and / what color to paint the / second bedroom is / meaningful: it’s / no / great / joy to me / that I plunge deeply / (I think) into things: / eternal / significance is of some / significance to me: I / don’t know just how: but / temporal significance is / a world I can partly make


Can’t we just give us poor people whose names end in “s” the courtesy of properly spelling the possessive? I know, no big deal, but it’s a pet peeve, as one who all too often is begrudged only a stingy apostrophe, after which, as any style manual will tell you, Michael Robbins’s name requires an “s,” just like you normal folk!
Love!
By the way, Oren has an essay about doing this. We also read it in one of his seminars; I came to loathe the poem & never finished it.
Huh. I wrote an earlier comment about my pet peeve, the refusal to grant us whose names end in “s” another “s” after the apostrophe. Ammons’s, Robbins’s, Stevens’s, etc. But that comment apparently didn’t like my admittedly lame joke name. So here is a minty one. That no-s business is fine for Jesus & Empedocles, but please give us moderns our s’s!
OK, sorry.
Not everyone follows Chicago Style, Michael. Also, I mention Oren in the first paragraph.
Well, this is making me seem very strange, but since you bring up Chicago style, I’ll just point out that Chicago is far from the only authority that insists on the additional “s” – in fact, apart from the AP style book (which is concerned only with space considerations in newspapers) & the MLA, almost all authorities demand it (I own no fewer than twenty-two that do so; only those two that don’t). But I didn’t mean to post so many comments. Somehow the template confused me. There should have been only two before yours. Sorry.
Why’d you loathe the poem?
Because it’s icky.