Two Views: On the Uselessness of Poetry
1/ From “Writing in the Margins,” James Longenbach’s omnibus poetry review in today’s NY Times:
The strength of American poetry depends on the fact that hardly anybody notices it. To emerging poets, eager for an audience, this marginality may seem frustrating, but it is the source of their freedom. Because nothing is at stake except the integrity of their medium, poets may write about anything in any way, from decorously rhymed couplets to sonically driven nonsense.…
Throughout “Vellum,” [Matt] Donovan confronts not only the power of art but also its potential uselessness, its beauty inextricable from its unnerving refusal to serve.
2/ From John Wilkinson’s “Off the Grid: Lyric and Politics in Andrea Brady’s Embrace” (first published in Chicago Review 53:1 and reprinted in Wilkinson’s new book, The Lyric Touch):
As lyric has become specialized and distinguished from other linguistic usages, its saving grace has been perceived from every angle as connected with its resistance to profit, instrumentality, and material progress—a perception that echoes all the way from conservative humanism to socialist meliorism, from religious authority to new theology, from formalist traditionalism to post-theory, Language-influenced poetics…. Uselessness is art’s use. The more art’s uselessness has figured as an exalted reduction, the more lyric poetry has been drawn toward prosodic movement as primary, with analysis and argument conducted under the aegis of this last-ditch spirit—spirit now lodged in the ruts of lineation and the angles of enjambment. For uselessness is merely status, while spirit is its working afflatus….Uselessness gives rise to spirit and spirit to the tentative sublime.

